Last Friday we decided to run a cine-forum for our friends...well we did it the previous month but there wasn't much discussion. We choose a topic and we watch a movie on that topic and then discuss the themes within the movie.
This month the topic was 'Media and Communication' and we watched 'State of Play' with Ben Affleck playing a congressman, and Russell Crowe playing his old college buddy who is now a successful investigative journalist.
It was such a thriller!!! Oh my gosh we were screaming and jumping in our seats- maybe just because we were a bunch of women. It was a great movie and provided a great story to discuss the ethics behind journalism, the fight for the truth and true friendship. I won't ruin the movie if anyone hasn't seen it but I will say some details.
I was able to discuss with people what I learned in my media subject last semester on media ethics and policy as we brought up the idea of ethical practices among journalists. Russell Crowe's character has many connection that allow him to obtain information easily but he often does things that are illegal, or he lies to get information. Often we justify this because of the unique nature of the journalism industry- truth seeking, however the end does not justify the means. BUT WHAT IS THE ANSWER???
I believe in an absolute truth. I believe that there are exceptions in certain cases when one good outweighs another but there can't be the whole industry of investigative journalism built on a 'special case'. Look at the Murdoch hacking scandal. No one condones that but at the same time, those that report on this issue take to unethical practices to obtain their information- "covertly recording the conversation." Just look at this:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/04/rupert-murdoch-caught-on-tape-talking-about-phone-hacking-scandal.html
In my media presentation on this, many pointed out that it is hard to put into practice any solid media policy reforms because media companies make so much more through unethical practices than any fine that could be placed on them for their behaviour. The competition is too great and it's a dog eat dog world in this industry.
So what do you think?
I will post more about these kinds of things in the future but maybe you can get the ball rolling.
Anyway as a budding journalist I can't say that I've answered the question of ethics and morality in investigative journalism so I'd have to resign myself to something a little less exciting or give up my values. At the moment I'll go with the first-
Alex
(P.S I love Calvin and Hobbes)